British health minister: Compulsory jabs not something London would consider

Mandatory coronavirus vaccination is not something the British government would “ever look at” bringing in, Health Secretary Sajid Javid has said.

London, 21 November 2021 (PA Media/dpa/MIA) — Mandatory coronavirus vaccination is not something the British government would “ever look at” bringing in, Health Secretary Sajid Javid has said.

His comments came as demonstrators took to the streets across Europe protesting against tighter restrictions amid a surge in infections.

Austria has announced plans to make jabs compulsory as the country deals with a lower vaccine uptake.

Just two thirds of their population have been vaccinated so far, and the government said jabs will be mandatory from Feb. 1.

Javid said Britain is “fortunate” to have less hesitancy around vaccines than other countries.

Speaking on the BBC’s “Andrew Marr Show,” he said: “It is up to Austria, other countries, to decide what they need to do. We are fortunate that in this country, although we have vaccine hesitancy, it is a lot lower than we are seeing in other places.”

21 November 2021, United Kingdom, London: UK Health Secretary Sajid Javid arrives at BBC Broadcasting House, London, to appear on the BBC1 current affairs programme, The Andrew Marr show. Photo: Dominic Lipinski/PA Wire/dpa

He added: “I just think on a practical level, taking a vaccine should be a positive choice. It should be something, if people are a bit reluctant, we should work with them and encourage them.

“In terms of mandatory vaccines for the general population I don’t think that is something we would ever look at.”

In England, the deadline for care home workers to be fully vaccinated was Nov. 11.

The government has said that front-line NHS and remaining social care staff working in registered providers must have received both vaccine doses by April 1.

Meanwhile, Javid said the current focus of the vaccine program is boosters — which have been extended to people aged 40 and above — and second jabs for 16- and 17-year-olds.

He said the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunization (JCVI) is looking at the possibility of boosters for all adults, a consideration included as part of an update given last week.

It stated: “Future considerations include the need for booster vaccination (third dose) for 18- to 39-year-olds who are not in an at-risk group, and whether additional booster vaccination (fourth dose) for more vulnerable adult groups may be required.”

Following a report that coronavirus jabs could be given to children younger than 12 next year, Javid said it would be “inappropriate” for him to comment at this stage on such a move.

Currently, covid vaccines are licensed in Britain only for children aged 12 and over, but the Sun newspaper reported leaked proposals which it said showed that health bosses are preparing to jab children aged between 5 and 11 next spring.

Asked if vaccines for this age group would be a step too far, Javid told Times Radio: “It’s not for me to say, I think that would be inappropriate. I really want to make sure whatever decisions we make on vaccines, that we’re getting the very best expert advice.”

Professor Sir Andrew Pollard, director of the Oxford Vaccine Group, said there is already “quite a lot of immunity building” in younger age groups when asked about coronavirus vaccines for the youngest children.

He told the “Andrew Marr Show”: “We are seeing lots of transmission already has happened in younger children, as well as in teenagers, and so we have quite a lot of immunity building in those age groups from infection.”

The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) has said “expected standards of safety, quality and effectiveness” must be met before vaccines would be authorized for children aged 5-11.

If the MHRA extended the licence for younger children, the Government would consider recommendations from the JCVI before any rollout.

Back to top button